That hasn’t stopped psychologists, social scientists, legal experts, and governmental agencies from debating the accuracy of cognitive ability. So why the debate? It stems from imperfect assessments used throughout history. Differences in cognitive ability across groups have been noted in traditional cognitive ability assessments. These scoring differences are commonly linked to differences in socio-economic status and as a result of structural inequality. We’re breaking away from that by pairing our Motivation and Personality assessments with Cognitive Ability. We don’t like structural inequality. It isn’t fair and it can prevent an organization from identifying the most qualified applicant.
